Panther protocol co-founder Oliver Gale discusses bringing zero-knowledge technology to multi-chain


Related articles

Privateness cash and zero-knowledge technology, which some use to obfuscate the id of sends/receivers and transaction quantities, have gained monumental recognition in recent times because of mounting regulatory surveillance towards the crypto sector. However regardless of their rapid rise in market cap, critics proceed to scrutinize such class of belongings as enablers for masking illicit actions.

In an unique interview with Cointelegraph, Oliver Gale, CEO, and co-founder of the Panther Protocol (ZKP), elaborated on the expertise behind its privateness decentralized finance, or DeFi, options and why it’s a necessity for at this time’s crypto house:

CT: How a lot did you elevate out of your current token sale, and what does your roadmap appear like from right here?

OG: We have raised over $30 million in complete. For Panther protocol, we did a number of non-public sale rounds, after which we did a public sale on November the twenty third, which was 90 minutes lengthy, and raised over $20 million throughout that point. The second query is across the roadmap itself, so Panther Protocol is a multi-chain privateness protocol with a number of zero-knowledge, knowledge disclosure instruments constructed into it; what we’re delivering in January is our minimal viable product (MVP).

We now have a number of deployments this month. And that might be delivering an MVP that enables staking on Polygon and transferability of the ERC-20 token to ZKP token. After which, I estimate 30 to 60 days later; we will deploy the entire v1.0 MVP, which could have the multi-asset privateness swimming pools and multi-asset staking swimming pools which are the shielded instruments through which Panther belongings can use be transacted privately. And that will even include a model of ZK reveals, which is the mechanism by which customers can voluntarily disclose their transaction knowledge for compliance functions or tax reporting functions, and many others. So that is what will be anticipated throughout Q1.

We now have over 5 EVM suitable partnerships in place to deploy Panther v1 on Close to, Flare, and many others. These shielded swimming pools are being deployed throughout completely different chains. After which, our workforce is constructing a ZK-driven interchange throughout different chains, and the objective is to permit these belongings to be swapped securely, with low charges, high and low transaction throughput.

CT: What is the underlying cryptography behind these belongings?

OG: So the multi-asset shielded swimming pools are based mostly on ZK-SNARKS. So you will have a mix. The shielded swimming pools are, you understand, a model of mixer expertise with the power to separate be a part of switch belongings. Then we use ZK snarks for proof of possession. So basically, transactions occur inside the multi-asset shielded swimming pools. And, after which the mechanism for knowledge disclosure reveals is one other ZK snark circuit, which is about as much as enable Primarily a trusted supplier to supply proof that may be verified on the planter community of some knowledge situation being met. And that whereas it has been utilized to compliance is our first use case, and have been put in ZK reveals into manufacturing with launched out, which is actually a launch is launched out is what it feels like.

CT: Skeptics would say that non-public networks utilizing zero-knowledge cryptography may change into enablers of illicit transactions. What are your ideas on the matter?

OG: In my opinion, for those who construct expertise and haven’t any intention of facilitating aiding and abetting or enabling crime, you aren’t responsible of any crime. However why is privateness wanted? Our white paper has this; the underside line is that actors who’re below surveillance behave in another way from those that aren’t. In different phrases, the precise habits of our societies is impacted by being watched. So inevitably, there are going to be unhealthy actors. 

However I’ve by no means seen a gun on trial. You do not put instruments on trial; you set folks on trial. And the overwhelming consensus of our world society, for all the instruments and applied sciences we use, is that if the gadget is extra helpful for almost all than the minority who abuse it, then you definately use it. And if that weren’t the case, then I am undecided we’d have any kitchen knives as a result of knives are used for prison exercise by a minority. So any try to put privateness expertise or blockchain expertise on trial as a result of a minority abused the system is an argument that may be extrapolated to something in life.