Polygon’s focus on building L2 infrastructure outweighs MATIC’s 50% drop from ATH

189
SHARES
1.5k
VIEWS


After a devastating 50% correction between Dec. 25 and Jan. 25, Polygon (MATIC) has been struggling to maintain the $1.40 assist. Whereas some argue this top-15 coin has merely adjusted after a 16,200% achieve in 2021, others level to competing scaling options progress.

MATIC token/USD at FTX. Supply: TradingView

Both approach, MATIC stays 50.8% beneath its all-time excessive at an $11 billion market capitalization. Presently, the market cap of Terra (LUNA) stands at $37 billion, Solana (SOL) is above $26 billion and Avalanche (AVAX) is at a $19 billion market worth.

Related articles

A constructive word is that Polygon raised $450 million on Feb. 7, and the funding spherical was backed by a few of blockchain’s most appreciable enterprise funds, together with Sequoia Capital.

Polygon presents scaling and infrastructure assist to Ethereum Digital Machine-based (EVM) decentralized functions (DApps). Apart from, it’s not affected by the excessive transaction charges and community congestion that affect the Ethereum community.

Nevertheless, as proof-of-stake layer-1 networks emerged and provided low-cost good contract capabilities, it vastly elevated the competitors for Ethereum community decentralized finance (DeFi), nonfungible token minting, marketplaces, crypto video games, playing and social functions.

Compared, Terra’s complete worth locked elevated by 340% between July and December 2021, reaching $12.6 billion. Equally, Avalanche’s good contracts deposits elevated from $185 million to $11.11 billion in the identical interval.

The usage of Polygon’s scaling resolution is declining

Polygon’s main DApp metric began to show weak spot in August 2021 after the community‘s TVL dropped beneath 4 billion MATIC.

Polygon Whole Worth Locked, MATIC. Supply: DefiLlama

The chart above exhibits how Polygon‘s DApp deposits peaked at 7.4 billion MATIC in July 2021, then drastically declined over the subsequent couple of months. In greenback phrases, the present $3.5 billion TVL is the bottom quantity since Might 2021. These figures symbolize lower than 5% of the combination TVL (excluding Ethereum), according to DefiLlama information.

One other constructive is that on March 9, Ankr, a multi-chain toolkit for blockchain infrastructure, enabled a token bridge between Ethereum and Polygon. The primary launch will permit the aMATICb liquid staking token to be despatched and saved. This permits customers to earn further layers of rewards on DeFi platforms.

To substantiate whether or not the TVL drop in Polygon is troublesome, one ought to analyze DApp utilization metrics. Some DApps, comparable to video games and collectibles, don’t require massive deposits, so the TVL metric is irrelevant in these circumstances.

Polygon DApps 30-day on-chain information. Supply: DappRadar

As proven by DappRadar, on March 10 the variety of Polygon community addresses interacting with decentralized functions grew by 5% versus the earlier month. Despite the fact that Polygon’s TVL has been hit the toughest in comparison with related good contract platforms, there may be stable community use within the gaming sector, as measured by Loopy Protection Heroes’ 199,260 lively addresses within the final 30 days.

On Nov. 16, Polygon launched its zk-STARK-powered Miden Digital Machine, a zero-knowledge Scalable Clear ARgument of Data. Polygon has additionally dedicated over $1 billion for creating complex DeFi applications that want delicate info redacted on digitized belongings, lowering their dimension for quick verification by blockchain members.

The above information counsel that Polygon is holding its floor versus competing chains, and people holders may not fear an excessive amount of about MATIC’s 50% value correction. Polygon’s ecosystem continues to flourish, and the truth that it presents a lot demanded layer-2 scaling options for a number of industries will be considered as a bullish issue.

The views and opinions expressed listed here are solely these of the author and don’t essentially mirror the views of Cointelegraph. Each funding and buying and selling transfer entails danger. It’s best to conduct your individual analysis when making a call.